When inquiry what he to be going come do about the “gun problem,” president Donald trump card responded that “we have actually done much an ext than most administrations.” Trump has actually taken some action to strengthen commonwealth gun control, yet his administration also has actually eased pistol restrictions.

You are watching: Have gun laws changed since obama

Trump make his comment on Aug. 4, ~ the fixed shootings in El Paso, Texas, and also Dayton, Ohio, saying: “We’re talk to a lot of people, and also a the majority of things are in the works, and a many of great things. And also we have actually done much an ext than most administrations. And also it go — it’s no — really no talked about very much, but we’ve done, actually, a lot. Yet perhaps much more has to be done.”

Here’s what the administration has done, and not done, so far.

Fix NICS Act

On march 23, 2018, trump signed right into law an appropriations plot that had the Fix NICS Act, a bipartisan measure aimed at improving the National immediate Criminal Background check System. The act, driven by Republican Sen. Man Cornyn and Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy, and also co-sponsored by a bipartisan mix the 76 other senators, compelled federal organ to send semiannual certification reports to the attorney basic on their compliance through record-keeping and also transmission requirements, and to come up v plans to increase coordination and also automated reporting. It lugged financial penalties for political appointees who didn’t comply.

The brand-new law also required the attorney basic to “establish implementation plans for each state and tribal government” and to “determine if the state is in compliance with the benchmarks consisted of in the implementation plan,” follow to a February bipartisan letter indigenous senators urging agencies, specifically the department of Defense and Department of countryside Security, to totally comply v the act.

Universal background Checks

Over the food of his presidency, Trump has sent combined public signals around his assistance for universal background checks, which would certainly cover personal sales by unlicensed individuals, including some sales in ~ gun shows and also over the internet. However when the Democratic-controlled home passed such a invoice in February, Trump stated he would certainly veto it, and the invoice stalled in the Republican-controlled Senate.

In the wake of the deadly mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High institution in Parkland, Florida, Trump organized a bipartisan meeting v members of congress on Feb. 28, 2018, to discuss measures to resolve gun violence. During the meeting, Trump seemed to market support for regulation — suggest by Sens. Joe Manchin and Pat Toomey ~ the Sandy Hook Elementary college shooting in 2012 — that would have expanded background checks to personal sales by unlicensed people at total shows and over the internet. The measure failed in a near 54-46 procedural vote in the Senate.

Here’s an exchange Trump had with Murphy, a support of the amendment:

Murphy, Feb. 28, 2018: Ninety-seven percent of american want global background checks. In states that have universal background checks, there room 35 percent less gun murders 보다 in states that don’t have actually them. And also yet, us can’t gain it done. There’s nothing else choose that, whereby it works, people want it, and we can’t perform it.

Trump: however you have actually a different president currently … you went with a many presidents and you didn’t acquire it done. You have actually a various president. And also I think, maybe, you have actually a various attitude, too. Ns think people want to obtain it done.

Murphy: Well, listen, in the end, Mr. President, the factor that naught has acquired done below is because the gun lobby has had actually a veto strength over any legislation the comes prior to Congress. Ns wish the wasn’t the case, however that is. And also if all we end up doing is the stuff that the gun sector supports, then this simply isn’t precious it. We room not going to do a difference. And also so i’m glad the you’ve sat down through the , yet we will obtain 60 votes top top a bill the looks prefer the Manchin-Toomey compromise on elevator checks, Mr. President, if you support it. If you come to Congress, if you involved Republicans and also say, “We space going to execute a Manchin-Toomey-like bill to get substantial background checks,” it will pass. However if this meeting ends up with just, sort of, pass out notions that future compromise, then nothing will happen.

Trump: ns agree. Us don’t desire that.

Murphy: and also so i think we have actually a unique opportunity come get an extensive background checks, and also make certain that nobody buys a gun in this country that’s a criminal it is seriously mentally ill, it is on the terrorist watch list. But, Mr. President, that going to need to be you the brings the republicans to the table top top this because, right now, the total lobby would avoid it in that is tracks.

Trump: I choose that responsibility, Chris. Ns really do. I think it’s time. That time the a chairman stepped up, and we haven’t had them. And I’m talking Democrat and Republican presidents — they have not stepped up.

Two days later, however, after Trump met privately with officials native the NRA, the White residence “softened its tone” — together the Washington Post put it — on background checks. Asked around the president’s place on lift checks, White home Press Secretary buy it Huckabee Sanders said reporters, “Not necessarily universal background checks yet certainly improving the background examine system. He desires to view what that legislation, the last piece of the looks like. ‘Universal’ means something different to a many people.”

Instead, trump card signed the appropriations plot that had the Fix NICS Act, as mentioned earlier.

After democrats took manage of the house in 2019, the House, top top Feb. 27, happen the Bipartisan Background checks Act — which, choose the Manchin-Toomey legislation, would broaden federal background check to gun purchases and transfers in between private parties, consisting of some offered at gun shows or end the internet not extended by existing law. The invoice passed 240-190 mainly along party lines, despite eight republicans voted because that it.

The following day, the home passed the intensified Background check Act that 2019, a bill the sought to close the so-called “Charleston Loophole” by expanding the window for perfect a background check from 3 to 10 business days.

In a policy statement, the management signaled that Trump would certainly veto both receipt if they ever passed. The statement stated the Bipartisan Background check Act “would i have loaded burdensome demands on specific firearm transactions.” according to the statement, the invoice “would need that specific transfers, loans, gifts, and sales of weapons be handle by a federally license is granted importer, manufacturer, or dealer that firearms” and “would therefore impose permanent record-keeping requirements and limitless fees top top these day-to-day transactions.”

The bill “contains very narrow exemptions from these requirements, and also these exemptions would not sufficiently protect the second Amendment best of people to keep and bear arms,” the statement read.

As for the intensified Background checks Act, the statement said Trump would oppose it due to the fact that “y overly extending the minimum time that a licensed entity is forced to wait because that background inspect results, would unduly i charged burdensome delays on individuals seeking to purchase a firearm.”

Neither bill has been taken up in the Senate, which is controlled by a Republican majority.

After the fixed shootings in Texas and also Ohio this previous week, though, trump card again shows up to be at the very least considering some version of a global background check bill.

Toomey and Manchin met individually with the chairman on Aug. 5 and also later issued a declare saying, “This morning, we both separately discussed with chairman Trump our assistance for passing our bipartisan law to combine background check to keep guns out the the hands of criminals, the dangerously holy spirit ill, and also terrorists when respecting the 2nd Amendment legal rights of law-abiding pistol owners and also all Americans. The president showed a willingness to work with united state on the problem of increase background checks.”

Before Trump travel to Ohio and also Texas ~ above Aug. 7, a reporter cited the House-passed background check bills that he intimidated to veto and asked what he would certainly support.

“Well, ns looking to carry out background checks,” trump said. “I think background checks space important. Ns don’t desire to put weapons into the hand of holy ghost unstable world or human being with rage or hate, noble people. Ns don’t want to — I’m every in favor of it.”

Trump included that he saw “no political appetite” in Congress because that a ban on assault rifles. But, he said, “There’s a an excellent appetite — and I mean a very strong appetite — for background checks. And also I think us can bring up background checks prefer we’ve never had before. I think both Republican and also Democrat are acquiring close come a invoice on — they’re law something on background checks.”

Bump share Ban

The department of Justice and the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives authorize a new commonwealth regulation on Dec. 18, 2018, official banning bump stocks, or devices that deserve to be attached to the behind of a semiautomatic rifle to do it shoot almost as fast as a fully automatic weapon. The ATF had formerly ruled 10 times between 2008 and also 2017 that details models can not it is in prohibited under existing gun laws.

The tools became component of the national gun conflict in October 2017 ~ 64-year-old Stephen Paddock used AR-style rifles affixed v bump share to shoot civilization attending an the end concert in ras Vegas. More than 50 people were killed and hundreds an ext were injured.

Then, in February 2018, after the Parkland, Florida, school shooting, Trump announced that he had actually signed a memorandum directing the attorney basic to “dedicate all available resources to complete the evaluation of the comment received, and, together expeditiously together possible, to suggest for an alert and comment a rule banning all devices that rotate legal weapons into machineguns.” The complying with month, on in march 23, the justice Department announced that it was proposing a ascendancy to the effect, which was finalized about ripe months later — despite objections from the NRA.

The final ascendancy required the owner of any bump stocks to damage the gadgets or revolve them in at an ATF office prior to March 26, when the ascendancy went right into effect.

Prosecuting Firearm Offenses

In his Aug. 5 remarks on the mass shootings in Ohio and also Texas, trump pointed come his administration’s document of prosecuting people who have violated commonwealth gun laws. “Last year, we prosecuted a record variety of firearms offenses,” he said.

There has been a notable rise in the effective prosecution of firearms offenses yearly under Trump.

In budget year 2019, the department of Justice effectively prosecuted 10,623 defendants of weapons offenses, according to data detailed by room spokesman Peter Carr. It is the most since at the very least fiscal year 1992, based on a testimonial of the department’s yearly statistical reports since fiscal year 1992. The vault high was 10,466 in budget 2006, together the chart listed below shows. (See “defendants guilty of weapons offense” in Table 3B in the budget 2010 report for fiscal year 1992 come 2010, and Table 3C in the fiscal 2017 report for fiscal years 2000 to 2017.)


Rescinded Social protection Rule

In so late February 2017, Trump signed right into law a joint resolution that eliminated an Obama-era dominance requiring the society Security administration to report come the FBI’s National immediate Criminal Background inspect System details disability beneficiaries considered unable to manage their finances because of a mental health and wellness condition.

The SSA rule, which to be issued in December 2016, was developed to comply v the reporting requirements mandated through the NICS advancement Amendment plot of 2007, which was signed into law in January 2008 by chairman George W. Bush. The law compelled federal organ to report people prohibited indigenous acquiring weapons to the NICS, and federal legislation prohibits someone “who has actually been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution” from buying or own a gun.

The SSA ascendancy said the in order to be report to the background inspect system, individuals had to meet five criteria, including having a severe psychological disability and having a representative assigned to handle their advantage payments. The Obama administration estimated that the reporting requirement would sheathe “approximately 75,000 world each year who have a documented mental wellness issue, receive handicap benefits, and also are can not to control those benefits due to the fact that of their psychological impairment, or who have been found by a state or commonwealth court to it is in legally incompetent.”

Trump opposed the rule since it “could endanger the 2nd Amendment legal rights of law abiding citizens,” the White residence said. The National Rifle Association, the American civil Liberties Union and many disability rights groups also said that that risked violating the civil liberties of part beneficiaries by unduly preventing them from gift able to buy firearms.

The law blocking the ascendancy from being implemented passed 235-180 in the House, with only six democratic votes, and 57-43 in the Senate, where four Democrats sustained it.

Redefining ‘Fugitive indigenous Justice’

In February 2017, under Trump, the room of Justice small the definition of “fugitive indigenous justice” as soon as determining that is prohibited from buying a gun. The issued a memo the said, “The current process of denying a NICS transaction based on the presence of an energetic warrant alone is no much longer valid.” The righteousness Department policy now uses the “fugitive indigenous justice” prohibitor only to individuals who fled your state come “avoid prosecution because that a crime or come avoid providing testimony in a criminal proceeding,” and who space “subject come a current or imminent criminal start or testimonial obligation.”

The plan change worked out a dispute between the ATF and the FBI that had actually lasted because at least 2008, according to a 2016 report by the righteousness Department’s Office that the Inspector General. The ATF had long maintained “that an separation, personal, instance is not a fugitive indigenous justice if they stay in the state wherein the warrant was issued,” when the FBI had actually been denying “transactions including the purchase of a firearm exterior the ar or other neighborhood jurisdiction wherein the warrant was issued, even if the acquisition is within the exact same state.”

In November 2017, the Washington Post report that, before Trump take it office, the righteousness Department’s Office of legit Counsel “sided with ATF and also narrowed the an interpretation of fugitives” and said that gun purchases should only be denied to fugitives that crossed state lines.

“After Trump was inaugurated,” the Post said, “the justice Department further narrowed the an interpretation to those who have fled throughout state currently to avoid prosecution for a crime or to avoid providing testimony in a criminal proceeding.”

Funding study of gun Violence

Although academics have actually for decades said over there is a crucial need for more research right into gun violence, the Trump management has shown no interest in restoring government funding for such research.

Since the late 1990s, the Centers for condition Control and Prevention has actually been wary of studying gun issues after the NRA objected come a collection of studies the it claimed supported for gun control. In 1996, NRA lobbyists convinced Congress come insert language, known as the Dickey amendment, in yearly appropriations receipt that says “none that the accumulation made easily accessible for injury prevention and also control at the Centers for disease Control and also Prevention may be provided to advocate or promote gun control.”

Compromise language accompanying a 2018 spending bill clarified that, if the ban remains, “the Secretary of Health and also Human services has declared the CDC has the authority to conduct study on the reasons of gun violence.” however without resources allocated, the extr language didn’t median much in practice, numerous researchers said NPR. In April, a CDC spokesperson called Politico, “Dedicated funding from congress would aid CDC to move forward in this work.”

This year, democratic appropriators in the residence allocated $50 million in following year’s spending plan to research gun violence: $25 million come the CDC and $25 million come the nationwide Institutes that Health. It remains to be checked out whether the Republican-controlled Senate will seek to piece that resources in negotiation this fall.

Trump has remained mum ~ above the subject. In Trump’s bipartisan meeting v members of congress in February 2018, Rep. Stephanie Murphy advocated removing the Dickey amendment native spending bills.

“It’s a crucial piece — having facts and scientific data is a vital piece in help us resolve this national public health and wellness issue,” Murphy said. “And so I would certainly hope that we, as lawmakers, deserve to have opinions around policies, but we have to all have great sets that facts.”

Trump responded noncommittally, saying, “Okay. Give thanks to you really much,” and also then moved on to the following topic.

The president’s propose budgets — i m sorry are mainly a symbolic declare of concerns — have dubbed for cutting the spending for the CDC and the NIH, and also have not had money earmarked because that research into firearm violence.

3D-Printed Guns

On June 29, 2018, the State Department settled a sue that began during the Obama administration over the digital publication that blueprints because that 3D-printed guns. The State department under the Obama management blocked the online publication, saying that the publisher, Defense Distributed, was violating firearm violin laws and regulations, the eight Export manage Act and the international Traffic in eight Regulations, due to the fact that the data would be accessible to those abroad.

In a solution to lawsuit lugged by Defense Distributed versus the State Department, the government likewise argued national security understand in the case, and also both a district and also appellate court sided with the State Department. The State department under trumped initially ongoing the legit fight, yet as our fact-checking colleagues at PolitiFact.com explained, the State room made an abrupt settlement offer when the situation turned to the worry of the defendant’s arguments about their first Amendment right to complimentary speech.

The settlement enabled the agency to proceed with the publishing of 3D blueprints. That to be promptly halted by an injunction from a ar court referee after numerous state attorneys general filed suit against the State Department. The case, in the Western district of Washington, is still pending.

The department of justice opposed that injunction, arguing that the situation was around the DOJ’s government to regulate the violin of items or solutions that “raise army or knowledge concerns.” The DOJ assured the if someone used the blueprints to actually manufacture plastic weapons, they would certainly run afoul of commonwealth law.

In a statement, then-Attorney general Jeff Sessions said, “Under federal law, the is illegal to manufacture or possess plastic weapons that room undetectable. Violation of this law is punishable by up to five years in prison. Together firearms present a far-ranging risk come public safety, and the department of righteousness will use every obtainable tool to intensely enforce this prohibition.”

The Brady facility to avoid Gun Violence has actually filed suit as well against the State Department, seeking records to explain why that had worked out the case. After the State Department had won at every phase of the case, that “out that the blue folded its win hand,” Joshua Scharff, an attorney at Brady, called us.

Trump himself wasn’t affiliated in the decision to settle, according to the White House. Trump tweeted on July 31, 2018, “I am looking right into 3-D Plastic guns being offered to the public. Currently spoke come NRA, doesn’t seem to make lot sense!” that was after the State Department’s settlement was do public. Top top Aug. 1, 2018, then-White home Press Secretary sarah Huckabee Sanders said the Justice room “made a deal without the president’s approval.”

Suggested Arming college Staff

After the Parkland, Florida, college shooting in February 2018, Trump said arming teacher or college personnel come lessen or deter such attacks.

“It’s called concealed carry, where a teacher would have actually a concealed gun on them,” Trump claimed on Feb. 22, 2018, during a meeting v students, teachers and also parents at the White House. “They’d walk for special training. … So stop say you had 20 percent of her teaching force, since that’s pretty lot the number — and also you stated it — an assault has lasted, top top average, around three minutes. The takes 5 to eight minutes for responders, for the police, to come in. So the attack is over. If you had a teacher v — that was adept at firearms, castle could really well finish the attack very quickly.”

Trump said, “We’re walk to be looking in ~ it very strongly,” and also said he believed it could “very well solve your problem” due to the fact that shooters “wouldn’t get in the school to start off with” if castle knew college personnel to be armed.

In December 2018, a federal Commission ~ above School safety and security issued a report that disputed including equipped school personnel in security preparedness. It said states, districts and also local schools must “etermine, based upon the distinctive circumstances the each college (such as anticipated law enforcement an answer times), whether or no it is ideal for devoted staff and also non-specialized employee to be equipped for the benefits of effectively and immediately responding come violence.”

The report outlined several questions schools and also districts must ask in determining even if it is they have to arm part personnel.

Reconsidering Gun half on part Federal Lands

The Trump management says the is reconsidering a Nixon-era policy that bans loaded weapons on the virtually 12 million acre of land and also water regulated by the army Corps that Engineers, other than where it permits hunting.

See more: Guy Cries After Shooting Ar 15, Gersh Kuntzman

The policy was challenged in commonwealth court, and the situation now sits in federal appeals court. The Obama administration defended the ban in court, however in September the 2017, the New York Times reported, the Justice department under trumped filed a motion stating that the military Corps to be “reconsidering the firearms policy challenged in this case.”

Although the ban at this time stands, Corps spokesman Dough Garman said Politico this week, “The U.S. Military Corps of designers is reconsidering the regulation the governs the possession and also transportation that firearms and also other tools at army Corps of designers water resources breakthrough projects.”

NYC total Rule

In May, Justice room attorneys filed a quick asking the U.S. Can be fried Court come overturn a commonwealth court that appeals decision upholding a brand-new York Police Department dominance that, in most cases, banned specific gun-license holders from transferring their handguns native the house or business address on their handgun license.

“Few regulations in the background of ours nation, or also in modern-day times, have come close to such a scan prohibition ~ above the transport of arms,” the quick said. “And on few of the rare occasions in the 19th and also 20th centuries as soon as state and local governments have embraced such prohibitions, state courts have actually struck them down. The is enough to develop that the transfer ban is unconstitutional.”

In January, the supreme Court i agree to review the situation — New York State Rifle and also Pistol Association, Inc. V. City of new York — which was initially filed in the U.S. Ar Court for the southern District of brand-new York in 2013. In a activity filed in July, however, the city asked for that the supreme Court bespeak the instance to be dismissed due to the fact that both the NYPD rule and state law have been amended and, the city argues, do the lawsuit “moot.”

he City has amended the tested regulation to allow holders that premises patent to transport their handguns to extr locations, including second homes or shooting ranges outside of city limits,” and also “the State of brand-new York has amended its handgun license statute to need localities to allow holders that premises patent to engage in such transport,” the motion states. “Independently and also together, the brand-new statute and also regulation provide petitioners whatever they have actually sought in this lawsuit. The Court should accordingly vacate the decision below and remand v instructions come dismiss — or at the very least to take into consideration in the an initial instance whether any type of Article III situation or conflict still exists.”