together America hold its breath because that the outcomes of this election, company owners have put up plywood for the second time in fifty percent a year, fearing a return the the massive protests and looting indigenous this previous summer. (Even Donald Trump’s Hollywood walk of call star is spanned up.) v the present president doing all he have the right to to delegitimize the outcomes if they execute not donate him, and with miscellaneous legal strategies supposedly afoot to declare victory before the votes are fully tallied while simultaneously claiming that his opponent cheated, the nation is ~ above edge. The NYPD has already prepared because that a sort of low-grade martial regulation if things start to acquire out that hand. That appears unprecedented.

You are watching: Have there been protests after other presidential elections

But is it? there have, that course, been mass protests in the past, some of them instigated through a certain outrage and transforming violent, yet did they specifically stem indigenous election-related anger? ns went ago today and also read newspaper coverage from the weeks prior to several poll that seemed as despite they can have incited solid feelings: 1860, 1864, 1968, 2000, and also a couple of others. I witnessed surprisingly few protests certain to the choice itself.

There were, of course, windy dissents everywhere those years, specifically in 1968: Antiwar marches occurred throughout much of the year, after Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination in April (an uprising in Harlem was headed off partly by market Lindsay’s swift decision to walk those uptown roadways in solidarity) and also related to the democratic National Convention in Chicago that August. And indeed there were a couple of eruptions on the morning after ~ Richard Nixon’s election: Protests cropped up around Rockefeller Center and in times Square and in Lafayette Park across from the White House. In ~ Rutgers–Newark, part glass doors were smashed. Marchers referred to as the choice “a fraud” and also “a hoax,” back they more than likely were no alleging yes, really ballot fakery but rather a basic Nixonian sneakiness. However not a single story stated boarded-up home windows in advance. A Reuters report coming before the election said that young world had plans for pranksterish events: releasing pigs to run in the streets, stripping naked in poll booths. (The last was to take place in san Francisco.)

In 2000 in Florida, the biggest disruption appears to have actually been the so-called Brooks brothers riot, in which a bunch the conservative activists demonstrated loudly in an attempt to shut down the vote recount. As we eventually learned, the whole thing was backed by the GOP Establishment, with Matt Schlapp and Roger rock among the organizers. (The legitimate team behind the stop-the-recount push had Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and John Roberts, a 3rd of today’s supreme Court.) the event, in spite of its nickname, was less grassroots protest than performance: it was really a bunch that operatives and lawyers, operating and lawyering.

How around in the 19th century? evaluate by the 1860 and 1864 coverage in the Times, over there wasn’t street-level violence of keep in mind in the aftermath of the election. Once I called up Bruce Schulman, a professor of background at Boston University, he agreed — although, he was fast to point out, “in 1860, the aftermath was the secession of 7 southern states, causing civil war! So over there was tremendous discontent with the results, but I can’t think of any examples of election Day protests. And not in 1864, either.” i did discover one little dustup between wall Street guys (backing Abraham Lincoln) and also some “rowdies,” however it doesn’t seem to have been much of a battle. The breeze riots, i m sorry tore apart new York in 1863, to be of course a second effect that secession and the battle which resulted.


however Schulman go flag one election, one the he has actually studied closely, when it happened. “In 1896,” when William McKinley was elected over wilhelm Jennings Bryan, “supporters that the competitor candidate rioted, an ext or less. The beat officer for the 18th Ward had to summon reinforcements to manage the crowd. The Chicago Daily Tribune, together it was referred to as then, reports that crowds did not diffuse until world were bruised and also ‘stained with blood.’ and in Manhattan, police tangled v the crowd that was obstructing streetcars, and also the new York Times report talks around immense throngs, lively, enthusiastic, parading up and also down Broadway indigenous 23rd come 42nd Street, yelling and shouting and also causing disruption. For this reason in Chicago, we check out a tangle between groups supporting candidates, and violence. In brand-new York, it’s more excited, a tiny like transforming over cars come celebrate victory after a sporting event.”

an additional scholar who researches this period, Gideon Cohn-Postar — he’s a postdoctoral other at the Andrea Mitchell facility for the research of Democracy at the university of Pennsylvania — reminded me that the Wilmington Massacre, the horrific 1898 occasion in which brutality explicitly descended indigenous an choice result. “Reconstruction was pretty much over, white supremacists were asserting control, and also in Wilmington, north Carolina, african Americans and also white moderates created a fusion party and won regulate in a city election. And also a couple of weeks after, a large group the white citizen gathered increase guns, consisting of a maker gun — the very early use of a an equipment gun! — and also marched through town. We still nothing know just how many civilization died.” (One calculation is 300.) “The mayor and also other officials were required to resign at the point of a an equipment gun. William McKinley, the Republican chairman who sustained African American vote rights, go nothing.” In other places, polling locations were sometimes moved in development of elections come forestall unrest: Cohn-Postar said me around one 1880 southern Carolina choice in which “the polling ar was going to it is in in a sector hall whereby lots of civilization had their businesses, and because civilization expected violence, there was a need that the be moved to the courthouse. And also there to be , although ns don’t think everyone died.” That details uprising was, together in Wilmington later on on, intended to return political power to white people.

And undoubtedly a many election-related violence has historically been around that, notes Ashley Howard, one assistant professor of afri American background at the university of Iowa. “Thinking about this particular night of mayhem, the closest thing I might think of was off-season regional elections, like all the violence bordering Kansas and whether it to be going to it is in admitted right into the Union as a complimentary state. Yes a the majority of violence around the recognize Nothing party in the 1850s, particularly a riot in 1855 in Cincinnati, and that was a local election, not a presidential one. And also then with the Reconstruction era, there’s uprisings, riots, voter suppression.” however she adds, correctly, the there’s constantly a slow-moving build prior to a publicly disruption happens. “In march 2016, Trump claimed that if the didn’t obtain the nomination, there’d be riots. And also when you look back over the previous two or three years, you check out this ramping up of a moment where violence is a actual possibility. As soon as we think about Charlottesville, around the variety of cars the drive into protests, when you think about policing in black neighborhoods, the opportunity of violence should not be surprising.” Often, she reminded me, the emphasis in conversations about protests like these is around the an outcome — property damage — rather than the things fueling the fire that subsequently brings the pot to a boil. As soon as I referred to as her, she taken place to it is in prepping to provide a class on the polite War.

See more: How Do You Clear An Ipod Touch, How To Clear An Ipod (5 Steps)

One huge difference between then and now, Schulman remarked to me, is that the nature of an choice in that era was inherently more boisterous. Local leaders the ethnic and also social and also other teams were informally deputized to deliver their blocs that voters: A ar Irish boss, say, would certainly be rewarded for obtaining his few hundred blue-collar Irishmen come the polls to poll for the autonomous slate. So there weren’t exactly protests, however there was definitely mayhem. “Remember, 19th-century poll in new York, and also in urban in general, would have actually featured huge amounts the alcohol due to the fact that that’s how you gained your armies of voter to the polls. There would have been riotous behavior, and also undoubtedly some merchants would have actually closed shop. Countless things favor food, music, drink were so vital to transforming out your army.” Tonight, it might be a most socially distanced takeout.