"Hell yes, we're going to take her AR-15, your AK-47," the Democratic challenger said. Doubters warn it will make criminal of great guys.

You are watching: Hell yes we’re going to take


Beto O'Rourke speaks during the autonomous Presidential debate at Texas southerly University's Health and PE facility on Sept. 12, 2019 in Houston, Texas.Win McNamee / Getty Images
For decades, gun national politics have had actually a familiar rhythm. Democracy ask for modest restrictions on details firearms and also their sales, and also gun rights teams warn voters that they"re comes to take it your firearms away.

Beto O"Rourke threw those terms out the window at Thursday night"s autonomous primary debate, confidently staking out a new left pole ~ above guns: "Hell yes, we"re going to take your AR-15, her AK-47."

Jumping off a proposal through Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., who dropped out of the presidential challenge earlier this year, O"Rourke has dubbed for a "mandatory buyback" of guns covered under a prospective assault weapons ban. The idea additionally has assistance from activist survivors the the Parkland high school shooting, and also Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., has actually backed the vast framework.


In the past, a prior assault weapons ban and proposed brand-new ones grandfathered in weapons that had already been purchased. The NRA estimates upwards of 15 million firearms that would be considered attack weapons are in circulation today.

On MSNBC"s "Morning Joe" on Friday, O’Rourke made clean he didn"t envision a scenario in which federal agents proactively confront noncomplying gun owner in their homes, no one is over there a it is registered of individual firearms they would have the ability to consult to perform so.

"It is mandatory, it will certainly be the law," O’Rourke said. "You will certainly be compelled to comply through the law. So, just like many of our laws, us don"t walk door-to-door looking people"s homes to watch if they are in truth breaking the law, we expect people to comply v the law."

But there are still major concerns, including from gun security advocates, about how to implement such a buyback, specifically if many gun owners refuse come comply.

As Democrats debate "mass incarceration" and whether the government has gone too far in prosecuting and jailing americans in the past, a ban on currently weapons can suddenly open up up millions of residents to gun charges if castle come into call with police investigating lesser crimes.

Some activist teams have argued an alternating approach that treats attack weapons like machine guns, i beg your pardon are required to it is in registered and taxed, yet are still legal to own and rarely provided in crime.

In both cases, though, compliance might still it is in a significant issue. Top top MSNBC, O"Rourke guess "most Americans space going to comply v the law" if his proposal were to it is in enacted, based upon his conversations through gun owners, and also only "the far outlier" is walking to be a challenge.

That"s not completely clear, however. For this reason far, state legislations that require gun owner to register firearms or get rid of extended magazines have showed up to generate low level of participation.

See more: Hey Kid Rock N Roll Rock On Songtext Von David Essex, David Essex

"What you"re doing is turning great guys right into criminals," Jon Caldara, a gun civil liberties activists that is refusing come comply through a local attack weapons ban in Boulder, Colorado, told NBC News last month.

Thursday night available a grim preview of just how this dynamic can get ugly. A Texas state lawmaker tweeted at O’Rourke "My AR is ready for you," i beg your pardon O’Rourke labeled a "death threat" and also said to be proof the "clearly, you shouldn"t own an AR-15 — and neither should anyone else."