Immigration Minister chris Alexander obtained a turbulent ride from Senator arts Eggleton once he appeared before the Senate committee researching S-7, likewise known as the zero yongin for barbaric cultural practices act. Eggleton suggested the regulation wasn't necessary, as required marriages, honour killings and polygamy space already against the law.

You are watching: Honour killing should not be called barbaric


*

Great exchange between Senator arts Eggleton and Immigration Minister chris Alexander throughout committee hearings on invoice S-7 6:54
Immigration Minister chris Alexander showed up before the Senate committee on person rights Thursday morning to advocate for S-7, his proposed zero tolerance for barbaric social practices act.

The legislation, presented in early November, would:

Amend the Immigration and also Refugee defense Act, do permanent occupants or temporary citizens inadmissible if they exercise polygamy in Canada. Amend the Civil marital relationship Act to ban marriage for anyone under the period of 16. Change the Criminal password to i have loaded a best five-year prison term ~ above anyone who "celebrates, aids or participates" in a marriage rite or ceremony discovering that among the people is gift married against their will or is no of legitimate age. Tackle the problem of honour killings through amending Criminal Code provisions that allow for the defence of provocation, i m sorry reduces the fee of killing to manslaughter whereby the accused plot "in the warm of passion." Perceived insult to family honour might be included among things that would certainly make one lose control.

Conservatives say these methods are incompatible v Canadian values.

Because polygamy and/or child marital relationship is legitimate in dozens the countries, Alexander has actually said there room "at the very least hundreds" of immigrants to Canada who room in these type of relationships. 

Who's 'barbaric'?

Senator art Eggleton took concern with the bill's title, questioning if that by extension the government was calling the social communities wherein the practices took place barbaric.

"Are girlfriend calling those human being barbarians?" he asked Alexander.

"The ar at which this invoice is handle is the ar of those who perpetrate violence versus women. It to know no bounds of culture, nationality, language," Alexander replied, adding the worry of murdered and missing aboriginal women could likewise be included.

"Forced marriages, honour killings, polygamy... Space already component of the criminal legislation of this country," Eggleton said. "Why is this necessary?"

"Because they're quiet happening," the minister said.

Eggleton inquiry why the federal government didn't prosecute lock under the present law, and also Alexander stated the existing law was not sufficient.

Alexander added that his government's strong measures over the last eight years have actually led to the crime and murder price dropping "as easily as they are in Canada."

Successful examples?

Eggleton provided the conservative had remained in government because that eight years yet still hadn't gained a conviction on polygamy.

"We're very proud to say that we've had arrests and charges laid for the first time in over 100 year in this country, and it never happened under a for free government, not once," Alexander replied.

The arrests head the existing legislation up for debate.

Alexander struggled to name any kind of cases where the motive of honour killing had actually successfully been offered as a justifiable part of the defence in the courts.

Eggleton claimed S-7 is based upon there having actually been cases where the courts had actually recognized an humiliation to honour as a legitimate excuse because that violence, and "there is no case."

"The defence of honour as a basis for provocation has been offered dozens of time in Canada and its an extremely existence under our criminal law weakens the defence that women and girls worthy to have in your own dwellings from their own relatives. We must not be enabling there come be any type of concept of family members honour, however construed, as a mitigating variable for the killing of a household member," Alexander said.

"We never have allowed it. The court has actually never accepted it," Eggleton replied.

See more: Has Jessica Alba Ever Posed Nude Scenes, Has Jessica Alba Ever Been Nude

"It can be supplied in the future and its an extremely existence sends a article to men... The their honour is somehow at stake and could be used to protect them in a court of regulation from the charge that murder," Alexander said.