Republican city council Ted Cruz has announced his candidacy because that President, again raising the problem of how human being born in other nations qualify for office under the Constitution.

You are watching: How can ted cruz canadian run for president

*
In the instance of Cruz, he was born in Canada in 1970, and his father was born in Cuba and his mommy was born together a United claims citizen in Delaware).

The Constitution’s herbal Born Citizenship Clause says that “no person other than a natural born Citizen, or a citizens of the joined States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office the President.”

The scholarly consensus around Cruz is that he’s most likely eligible to operation for the office that President and also serve in the White residence for numerous reasons.

Sarah Helene Duggin native Catholic University, who is an expert on this topic, created at size for us about a potential Cruz candidacy earlier in October 2013, and also she explained why scholars think Cruz is eligible.

Duggin said that the “consensus rests on firm foundations” based upon the will of the citizen clause, as declared in a letter in 1787 from john Jay to George Washington; the language that the 1790 citizen Act; and also the 14-year residency necessity in the Constitution’s write-up II.

So why is there even a debate around a Cruz candidacy? Two far-ranging factors that allow for some doubt room the facts the constitutional convention didn’t discuss the exact an interpretation of the indigenous “natural born citizen” and the can be fried Court has never rule on that issue.

“For city council Cruz—who was born in Calgary, Alberta, to an American mother and also a Cuban father—the inquiry is an ext complicated,” Duggin said back in October 2013. “There is a strong argument the anyone that acquires United claims citizenship at birth, even if it is by virtue the the 14th revised or by operation of federal statute, qualifies as natural born. The supreme Court, however, has never rule on the definition of the natural-born citizenship requirement. In the lack of a definitive supreme Court ruling—or a constitutional amendment—the parameters the the clause continue to be uncertain.”

Cruz isn’t the very first person to run for President who wasn’t born in the joined States. In 2008, john McCain confronted questions since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone. And Mitt Romney’s father, George Romney, was born in Mexico, and also he challenged questions throughout his 1968 presidential campaign.

In February, Cruz again addressed questions about his qualifications because that office in ~ the CPAC political meetings.

“I to be born in Calgary. My mom was an American citizen by birth,” Cruz said. “Under commonwealth law, the made me an American citizens by birth. The Constitution requires that you be a natural-born citizen.”

Two influential legal authorities, Neal Katyal and also Paul Clement, stated in a Harvard regulation Review write-up that “there is no concern that city council Cruz has been a citizens from birth and is therefore a ‘natural born Citizen’ in ~ the definition of the Constitution.”

“As Congress has recognized due to the fact that the Founding, a human being born overseas to a U.S. Citizen parental is normally a U.S. Citizens from birth through no need for naturalization. And also the expression “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution includes all together citizens native birth,” they added. “Thus, an separation, personal, instance born to a U.S. Citizen parent — even if it is in California or Canada or the Canal region — is a U.S. Citizen from birth and also is completely eligible to offer as president if the civilization so choose.”

In the long run, the conflict would be resolved by a constitutional change.

See more: How Do I Get The Blue Check On Instagram, Verify Your Accounts On Facebook And Instagram

“The finest solution would be come amend the Constitution, as plenty of legislators on both political parties of the aisle have actually proposed over the years. In the absence of an amendment, the clause must be narrowly interpreted,” Duggin said back in 2013.