Despite repetitively failing to development legislation through the Senate, republic in Congresshave not abandonedtheir goal of repealing and replacing the Affordable care Act (ACA). The latest attempt in ~ repeal in the type of theGraham-Cassidy billwould have developed a per capita lid on federal Medicaid financing, got rid of the separation, personal, instance mandate, andunderminedprotections because that older adults and also people with preexisting conditions, by allowing states come opt the end of crucial ACA insurance money regulations. The would additionally have eliminated funding for the ACA’s Marketplace premium and also cost-sharing subsidies and also Medicaid expansion, and redirected several of that funding toward block sponsor to states.

You are watching: How did my representative vote on obamacare repeal

One puzzling facet of this and previous repeal initiatives is that they almost succeeded despite widespread public support for the core facets of the ACA the would have actually been overturned. Althoughalmost 80 percentof nonelderly adults favor maintaining the Medicaid expansion and nearly 70 percent favor maintaining the premium subsidies, previous legislation eliminating or weakening this provisions happen the home by a vote of 217--213 (with residence votes by district shown in exhibit 1) and fell simply a couple of votes quick of happen the Senate. ACA protections for human being with preexisting conditions---including guarantee issue, ar rating, and essential health benefits---are even more popular, eliciting assistance of 80 percent to 90 percent that nonelderly adults, and age rating boundaries are supported by three-quarters of adults.

Exhibit 1: US home Of Representatives’ Votes for The American Health care Act, By congressional District

*

Source: GovTrack.us. Note: AHCA is American Health treatment Act.

A feasible explanation because that the perseverance toward repeal despite itsunpopularityis that inhabitants in districts and also states wherein members of conference voted because that repeal might exhibit much less support for crucial ACA provisions compared to those life in districts and also states where members voted against repeal. If favorability toward these provisions different widely throughout politically polarized conference districts and states, voting fads in Congress might simply reflect legislators’ responsiveness come the choices of your constituents. In contrast, if favorability toward ACA provisions is high throughout districts and states, the would suggest that the push for repeal is motivated by factors beyond constituent demands.

Most Nonelderly adult Support maintaining Core ACA Provisions In Districts whereby Members the The house Voted for Repeal

To recognize the link between congressional votes and also public opinion on ACA repeal, we provided data from the urban Institute’s in march 2017Health Reform security Surveyto examine public support for maintaining or repealing main point ACA provisions among a sample of much more than 9,500 nonelderly adults---and the potential influence of repeal top top coverage---based on how their member that the US home of to represent voted because that the American Health treatment Act (AHCA) critical May and also how their senators voted for the better Care Reconciliation plot (BCRA) and Obamacare Repeal and Reconciliation act (ORRA) critical July. Senators poll on a 3rd repeal bill, the Health care Freedom Act, that would certainly have eliminated the separation, personal, instance mandate without directly targeting various other core coverage provisions described in the survey.

We discovered that although assistance was somewhat lower in house districts where representatives voted for the AHCA, 75.2 percent of adult in these districts supported keeping the medicaid expansion and also 64.3 percent of castle supported maintaining the premium subsidies (Exhibit 2). In districts where representatives voted against AHCA, assistance was 81.0 percent for Medicaid expansion and 72.6 percent because that the premium subsidies. There to be no distinctions by districts’ home votes in support for the ACA’s guaranteed issue and community rating provisions, and also only slightly greater support for crucial health advantage requirements and age rating limits in districts wherein representatives voted versus the AHCA.

Exhibit 2: assistance For maintaining ACA Provisions together Of march 2017 among Adults eras 18--64, through US home Of Representatives’ Votes for The American Health treatment Act

*

Sources: health Reform security Survey, quarter 1, 2017; GovTrack.us. Notes: ACA is Affordable treatment Act. AHCA is American Health care Act. */**/*** calculation differs considerably from adults in districts wherein representative voted for the AHCA in ~ the 0.10/0.05/0.01 level, using two-tailed tests.

Little Or No Variation throughout States In assistance For core ACA Provisions

Support for Medicaid expansion did not vary across states. In states where at the very least one city council voted for either the BCRA or the ORRA, 77.5 percent of adults supported maintaining the medicaid expansion, i m sorry is not significantly different from the 79.1 percent supporting Medicaid expansion in states where both senators voted against both repeal bills (Exhibit 3). Support for keeping premium subsidies to be somewhat reduced in says where a city council voted because that repeal (65.7 percent versus 71.9 percent). In states where both senators voted versus both repeal bills, adult were just 2.2 percent points much more likely to assistance guaranteed issue, 2.0 portion points much more likely come support neighborhood rating, and 4.3 portion points much more likely to support age rating boundaries relative to adult in states where at the very least one councilor voted because that repeal. Support for important health services was comparable in every state group.

Exhibit 3: support For keeping ACA Provisions together Of march 2017 among Adults eras 18--64, By us Senators’ Votes for The BCRA and also The ORRA

*

Sources: health and wellness Reform security Survey, quarter 1, 2017; GovTrack.us. Notes: ACA is Affordable care Act. BCRA is better Care Reconciliation Act. ORRA is Obamacare Repeal and also Reconciliation Act. */**/*** calculation differs significantly from adults in states where at least one city council voted because that the BCRA or the ORRA in ~ the 0.10/0.05/0.01 level, making use of two-tailed tests.

It is possible that members of conference are an ext responsive to particular segments of their districts and also states, consisting of those individuals who room most most likely to poll or those who take part in major elections. However, we uncovered that in districts wherein representatives voted for the AHCA, support for many core ACA provisions to be high among those that either self-identify as Republicans or lean towards the Republican Party platform, consisting of those who describe themselves together “strong” republic (Exhibit 4). Majorities the both teams supported maintaining the medical allowance expansion and consumer protections. About half of those who determine as Republican or skinny Republican and 41 percent of solid Republicans supported maintaining the premium subsidies. Comparable patterns were found among Republicans in states where at least one city council voted because that repeal. We likewise found prevalent support throughout all districts and also states amongst groups v high voter joining rates, consisting of those eras 50--64 and those with high level of education and income (data not shown).

Exhibit 4: assistance For keeping ACA Provisions as Of march 2017 amongst Republicans ages 18--64 In Districts and States wherein Members Of conference Voted because that Repeal

*

Sources: health Reform monitoring Survey, quarter 1, 2017; GovTrack.us. Notes: ACA is Affordable treatment Act. AHCA is American Health treatment Act. BCRA is better Care Reconciliation Act. ORRA is Obamacare Repeal and also Reconciliation Act.

Repeal would Jeopardize Coverage and also Benefits that Adults throughout House Districts

Adults v Marketplace coverage or Medicaid---including the medical allowance expansion populace and those enrolled in medicaid under pre-ACA eligibility rules---could be impacted by repeal of medicaid expansion, benefit cuts resulting from the establishment of every capita caps on medicaid funding, removed of premium subsidies, and/or loss of consumer protections. The re-superstructure of adults v these species of coverage is bigger in house districts whereby representatives voted against the AHCA. However, these transforms would still impact many adults in districts wherein representatives voted because that the AHCA. About 1 in 5 adult (19.5 percent) in house districts whereby members voted against repeal to be enrolled in medicaid or Marketplace coverage, compared to around 1 in 6 adult (16.3 percent) in house districts wherein members voted because that repeal (Exhibit 5). These distinctions were propelled by the higher Medicaid enrollment in states broadening Medicaid, wherein representatives were an ext likely come vote against the AHCA; there were no far-reaching differences in Marketplace enrollment. Second 3 percent of adults were enrolled in non-Marketplace nongroup coverage both in districts wherein representatives voted because that the AHCA and also in districts where they go not. This adults room not eligible because that premium subsidies yet could shed protections against discrimination by age or wellness status. Virtually two-thirds (63.3 percent) that adults with Marketplace plans with a premium reported that their premium to be subsidized (data not shown). Another 18.5 percent of Marketplace enrollees with a premium go not understand whether they received a subsidy, indicating the the 63.3 percent report a subsidy to represent a reduced bound ~ above the share v subsidized coverage.

Exhibit 5: share Of Adults ages 18--64 Enrolled In Medicaid and Marketplace Coverage together Of march 2017, through Representatives’ and Senators’ Votes because that Repeal

*

Sources: health Reform security Survey, quarter 1, 2017; GovTrack.us. Notes: ACA is Affordable treatment Act. AHCA is American Health care Act. BCRA is far better Care Reconciliation Act. ORRA is Obamacare Repeal and also Reconciliation Act. */**/*** estimate differs substantially from adults in districts or claims where representatives/senators voted for repeal at the 0.10/0.05/0.01 level, utilizing two-tailed tests.

In says Where Senators Voted because that Repeal, A bigger Share of The populace Would be At hazard Of losing Marketplace Coverage

Although adults were much more likely to be enrolled in medical allowance in states where both senators voted against both repeal bills (which were generally Medicaid growth states) 보다 in states where at the very least one senator voted because that repeal (14.8 percent versus 10.7 percent), Marketplace coverage was slightly greater in states where a city council voted because that repeal (6.0 percent matches 4.6 percent) (Exhibit 5). The distinction in Marketplace enrollment is most likely due in component to eligibility for Marketplace subsidies for adults through incomes between 100 percent and also 138 percent that the commonwealth poverty level in says that did not expand Medicaid.

Limitations come The Analysis

One limitation to this evaluation is the our sample is just adults eras 18--64, and also there may be an ext variation in public opinion toward the ACA throughout districts and also states among the elderly population. However, we found comparable patterns throughout states and districts once we minimal our sample to adults ages 60--64, arguing levels of support throughout districts and states may be continual for older period groups as well. In addition, windy opinion towards the ACA has changed since march 2017, althoughmostpollshave displayed a climb in assistance for the ACA, and growingoppositionto repeal legislation would indicate an even larger gap between congressional efforts and constituent preferences.

See more: ‘The Big Bang Theory’ Series Finale: How Did The Big Bang Theory End To Longest

Without A Strategy for Protecting Coverage, Repealing main point ACA Provisions Threatens current Gains In Health treatment Access

These findings suggest that congressional votes come repeal the ACA’s main point financial aid provisions and consumer protections room not aligned with the choices of constituents. Moreover, the potential loss of coverage and benefits native repealing this provisions and also transforming medicaid financing is high in both areas where members that Congress are pursuing repeal and also areas wherein members have actually opposed repeal. Public opinion and also concern because that those who would it is in harmed may have actually helped derail repeal efforts thus far, but Republicans have come close to securing a legislative bulk that is not deterred by these factors. If legislation modeled ~ above Graham-Cassidy or vault repeal receipt succeeds there is no a clear strategy for sustaining coverage, the is likely to turning back the recentgainsin health care accessibility and affordability in districts and states throughout the country.